Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 1:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How Nature was able to understand what we need.
#3
RE: How Nature was able to understand what we need.
You're not thinking about it properly.

Evolution is a directionless process.  To take your example, suppose we have a creature with no visual sense capability (no eyes) at all.  For a million generations or so, these creatures managed to survive - they didn't 'need' sight, neither they nor nature 'decided' anything.

One day, one of these creatures underwent a mutation - just one of those random genetic scrambles that can happen in the best of families.  This particular mutation turned a few skin cells light-sensitive.  They weren't 'eyes' in any meaningful sense of the word, they merely enabled this particular creature to distinguish a slightly darker area from a slightly lighter area.  Over time, mostly through trial and error, the creature made the association of food with the slightly lighter area (the things it ate happened to be in the light).  And bingo, the mutation turns out to be beneficial.  These few light-sensitive cells gave the creature better access to a food source.  Being able to eat better means you're likely to stay alive long enough to have offspring, some of which may inherit your mutation.  Over time, selection pressure improves the light sensitivity as well as the organization of the cells in question.  In another million or billion generations (evolutionary processes are nothing if not patient), you have eyes.

And no one had to decide anything.


Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: How Nature was able to understand what we need. - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - October 13, 2017 at 9:23 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Human Nature Alan V 287 18162 May 3, 2025 at 6:18 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  In the future men will be able to carry children just like women rado84 110 18298 October 4, 2016 at 9:12 am
Last Post: mcolafson
  On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory. Whateverist 7 1979 August 29, 2016 at 4:02 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Sleep patterns. Nature or Nurture? ignoramus 19 3162 July 6, 2016 at 4:19 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Nature: Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Dolorian 10 4907 October 12, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas
  Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents? Alter2Ego 20 10201 August 13, 2013 at 9:48 am
Last Post: Something completely different
  They were able to record a thought being formed in a zebrafish. Annik 3 2414 February 1, 2013 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Women and Nature KichigaiNeko 18 8760 August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused
  TO ALL THEISTS: EVOLUTIONARY THEORY IN A NUTSHELL YOU CAN UNDERSTAND. Creed of Heresy 47 24605 May 11, 2012 at 10:49 am
Last Post: Jovian
  Raw Nature Zen Badger 12 6897 March 28, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)