Reasoning showing homosexuality is evil.

[Ravenshire]

Like the religious fuck-wit you've become, you now parrot the teachings of other religious fuck-wits in  drawing a comparison between homosexuality and incest. You probably believe that incest is more prevalent in homosexuals too, don't you?

I went on to say, she had the exception in mind, so I am not using that at all, nor did I compare the two. I am attacking the premise, but even in that, said I knew she had that exception in mind so am not holding it against the generality of the premise. But then I showed the generality get's destroyed even further and is generally not true.

Well then, I'll apologize for that point.

And then I made an argument that was unrelated to all that, which showed to be evil and wrong as well. And it is another argument, that provides clarity.  Let us be honest to yourselves You guys don't want morals to be clear, you don't want good and evil to be clearly defined.

Even though you continue to stumble along in ignorance. Right and wrong are quite clearly defined for many things, less clearly for others. Good and evil, as you present them, are bullshit made up by religions.

You want a soup of grey where you choose to hold on to whatever you like and make your own standards. For a people who always argue there are no objective morals at all, you guys are very adamant for the morals you believe.

How does holding adamantly to a morality (or any other belief) make one shit-bit of difference to whether that morality is subjective (they all are) or objective (none of them are)?