(October 21, 2017 at 3:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: So I guess It's safe to say that no one has put forth any evidence that proves the flood wrong?
Huggy in a debate ...
![[Image: fingers+in+your+ears.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-wt9zUgSQ7os%2FT0kZ2NbsUsI%2FAAAAAAAAB7Q%2FVoh_sbZceH8%2Fs1600%2Ffingers%2Bin%2Byour%2Bears.jpg)
(October 21, 2017 at 3:19 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Shall we move on? I believe next on Matilda's list was "a bat is not a bird".
You'll just say some shit like a bird is a generic term even though the Bible specifically refers to it as a bird and biologists know that birds have an entirely different evolutionary ancestry than bats.
Birds are descended from dinosaurs.
Bats are mammals.
In the same way you said:
(October 19, 2017 at 12:04 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: "Kind" and "sort" are synonymous with "species" buddy.
So not only do your beliefs rely on cherry picking from scientific knowledge that you do not believe are true, quote mining, selecting between incompatible justifications as and when the situation calls for it, but they also rely on equivocation. And by that I mean using ambiguous definitions that no one else uses so you can contract or extend the meaning as you need to.
"Kind" and "sort" are terms with imprecise meaning that only creationists use. "Species" has a very definite and exact meaning. They are not synonyms, in the same way that a bird is more than just a small living flying thing.