(October 24, 2017 at 10:53 am)Harry Nevis Wrote:(October 24, 2017 at 10:49 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Is that how were going to play it? You have absolutely no idea how long it would take any number of animals to repopulate the earth, that is something that has never been observed, so you're not even talking science right now.
Well how about this, the way our cells work make abiogenesis an impossibility, but for some strange reason that doesn't debunk abiogenesis, instead scientists theorize that ancient cells must have operated differently from modern cells.
So what makes you so sure that cells don't degrade after reproduction (In all other cases a copy of a copy of a copy would be inferior to the original), so while we may currently see ill effects caused by a low gene pool, maybe ancient species didn't due to stronger genetics.
So
Man, you really are out of your depth. You don't know the first thing of what you're talking about. It seems you barely understand the basic definitions of the words science, abiogenesis and genetics, let alone know anything about them.
You're an embarrassment.
Starting at 3:22 of the above video.
Quote:Modern cells separate themselves from the environment with a lipid bi-layer. The problem with modern phospholipids is they are too good at what they do. They form a nearly impenetrable barrier. modern cells must use proteins to move molecules across their surface, But life didn't have to start with modern chemicals!
You were saying?