RE: Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite
October 24, 2017 at 11:33 am
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2017 at 11:37 am by Crossless2.0.)
(October 24, 2017 at 11:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 24, 2017 at 11:14 am)KevinM1 Wrote: OMFG, Huggy, did you even watch the rest of the video? It's definitely not the gotcha you think it is.
But, please, keep making our point for us.
This is what happens when you're a Google scholar, and you look for headlines to prove your conclusion rather than actually learn things.
As usual you missed the point, there was no "gotcha", I simply stated that scientists theorize that abiogenesis would be impossible based on how modern cells work.
Was that statement true or false?
Irrelevant since no one in the field of abiogenesis thinks that contemporary cells are the model for how protocells worked.
And that would include Dr. Jack Szostak, who apparently isn't so despairing of the field that he isn't actually conducting research into it now.
Maybe Szostak didn't get the memo that he doesn't believe abiogenesis is a viable field of scientific study? Set him straight, Huggy! I wouldn't want to see a Nobel Prize winner waste his time on research that you've already concluded is fruitless.