RE: Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite
October 24, 2017 at 11:35 am
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2017 at 11:37 am by Huggy Bear.)
(October 24, 2017 at 11:29 am)KevinM1 Wrote:(October 24, 2017 at 11:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote: As usual you missed the point, there was no "gotcha", I simply stated that scientists theorize that abiogenesis would be impossible based on how modern cells work.
Was that statement true or false?
False, because that scientist said nothing of the sort. Indeed, he gave a plausible account of how the first cells could've been formed, and how they could've evolved into what we see today.
Like I asked, did you even watch the video? Because he very clearly said "Our cells, today, wouldn't allow for abiogenesis, but here's the thing: organisms aren't the only things that evolve. Cells do, too. And here's a way in which it could've happened."
Wait... Am I missing something?
(October 24, 2017 at 11:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I simply stated that scientists theorize that abiogenesis would be impossible based on how modern cells work.
Was that statement true or false?
(October 24, 2017 at 11:29 am)KevinM1 Wrote: False, because that scientist said nothing of the sort.
(October 24, 2017 at 11:29 am)KevinM1 Wrote: Because he very clearly said "Our cells, today, wouldn't allow for abiogenesis,
Isn't that exactly what I said? wouldn't "our cells today" be classified as modern cells?
