RE: Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite
October 24, 2017 at 1:10 pm
(This post was last modified: October 24, 2017 at 1:15 pm by Harry Nevis.)
(October 24, 2017 at 11:02 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 24, 2017 at 10:53 am)Harry Nevis Wrote: Man, you really are out of your depth. You don't know the first thing of what you're talking about. It seems you barely understand the basic definitions of the words science, abiogenesis and genetics, let alone know anything about them.
You're an embarrassment.
Starting at 3:22 of the above video.
Quote:Modern cells separate themselves from the environment with a lipid bi-layer. The problem with modern phospholipids is they are too good at what they do. They form a nearly impenetrable barrier. modern cells must use proteins to move molecules across their surface, But life didn't have to start with modern chemicals!
You were saying?
But you don't understand the subjects you are posting about. All you're doing is searching for anything that supports your beliefs, and accepting it's true.
(October 24, 2017 at 11:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 24, 2017 at 11:14 am)KevinM1 Wrote: OMFG, Huggy, did you even watch the rest of the video? It's definitely not the gotcha you think it is.
But, please, keep making our point for us.
This is what happens when you're a Google scholar, and you look for headlines to prove your conclusion rather than actually learn things.
As usual you missed the point, there was no "gotcha", I simply stated that scientists theorize that abiogenesis would be impossible based on how modern cells work.
Was that statement true or false?
False. Just how many scientist say this?
(October 24, 2017 at 11:35 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Isn't that exactly what I said? wouldn't "our cells today" be classified as modern cells?
And there would be no difference between modern cells structure and cell structure billions of years ago?
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam