Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 8:30 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 30, 2017 at 9:46 pm)Godscreated Wrote: I've breed and been involved in breeding Rottweilers for many years and they are still dogs and not only that they are still Rottweilers. We breed out certain things we do not want in the breed, yet they keep popping back up after hundreds of breedings, the info was never lost it just wasn't dominate until the right dogs were breed and bang there is that old thing we were trying to breed away into a recessive gene that wouldn't rear it's ugly head. We even have data bases with dogs to help us to breed out traits we do not want to have such as the white patches that come up on their chest from time to time, this gene is hundreds of years old and try as we may it is still rearing it's ugly head, even in the highest quality Rottweilers.

It's precisely because the white patch is produced by a recessive gene that it's difficult for you to breed it out. It means that you could be propagating the genes for this trait throughout your population of dogs without realising it. And not all genes are recessive. If they were then we wouldn't have to call it a recessive gene, we'd just call it a gene. If it was a dominant gene then it would be easy to get rid of.

What this should be telling you is just what kind of time scales are involved with the evolutionary process. Religionists always make an unfounded assumption that natural processes work on timescales relative to their lifetime yet they have no basis for making this assumption.

And ironically, having recessive genes helps a species avoid becoming trapped in evolutionary dead-ends because the genes can persist in the population without lowering the fitness of the carrier, yet can prove beneficial if the environment changes later on.

I'd just like to finish by saying that pedigree dog breeders are evil scum who breed populations of unhealthy dogs fated to either suffer from birth or have a short life span. And they do this merely for their own arbitrary aesthetic satisfaction.

Just let dogs be happy, healthy dogs and stop using some kind of canine eugenics to breed fucking short lived freaks destined to suffer.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution. - by I_am_not_mafia - October 31, 2017 at 7:19 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Do we have any female Christians left? If not, anyone is welcome to comment. Losty 34 4309 May 13, 2019 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: WolfsChild
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 10260 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Two audio books for Christians (and, everyone else) Jehanne 3 700 January 16, 2019 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Does everyone else feel dizzy from the lights in Church? Der/die AtheistIn 15 2797 December 11, 2017 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Any one else watch The Last Days of Jesus on PBS ? vorlon13 9 2883 April 16, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do Christians become Christians? SteveII 168 36985 May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians Nope 155 57045 September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  The first Christians weren't Bible Christians Phatt Matt s 60 17649 March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
Last Post: rightcoaster
  Why Christians Attack Evolution Michael Schubert 318 41451 March 21, 2014 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  Looking for Something Else and Stumbled Across This. Minimalist 2 1166 July 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)