(October 30, 2017 at 9:21 pm)Godscreated Wrote: Those creation scientist you like to refer to as not understanding evolution know are great deal about it, many were atheist and evolutionist that just couldn't reconcile it with the information that was available. Many of the scientist that work for the Creation ministries are hired from secular universities where they were taught evolution and not creation science. All these scientists have PHD's and I have personally seen debates between an evolutionary scientist and a creation scientist, I guess I do not have to tell you who came out on top of the debates, I will say this the evolutionary scientist didn't stand a chance, after two debates he gave up and hasn't had one since that I know of.
Yes I repeat what they say, they are the highly educated ones and what I read I agree with them, if I didn't I would say so. I'm not one to be lead around by the nose you could ask anyone in my church and they would tell you the same thing. By the way no new information can be added to DNA and without that no new kind can evolve. A mutation is a step backwards even some of the other atheist have said this.
GC
How can you say these "scientists" know a great deal about evolution, when it is obvious you don't? And you're lying about being atheists or teaching evolution. And debates decide truth? Again, this shows you're lack of critical thinking skills. Creationist/evolution debates are never about facts or truth - they're all about emotional appeal.
And what is this "mutation is a backward step" bullshit? You're assuming a plan, a goal. There is none, except to survive.
Crack a real book on evolution. You make yourself look silly.
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam
