For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.

[SteveII]

Or I was just pointing out that an inference based on an assumption of naturalism is different than an inference based on the scientific methods (as I have been doing for many pages). Do try to keep up if you are going to make peanut gallery comments.

The scientific method has a -requirement- of methodological naturalism, Steve.  It's axiomatic to the whole process.

Do you understand why you're being mocked..yet?  You talk shit from a position of abject ignorance.

You are intentionally twisting my meaning.. "an inference based on an assumption of naturalism" is not the same as "methodological naturalism". I have been very very very clear that I am arguing that an inference on naturalism alone--without the scientific method support--is not a scientific fact.