(November 3, 2017 at 12:58 am)Godscreated Wrote:(November 2, 2017 at 9:33 pm)possibletarian Wrote: Making the claim that such a fantastic creature as that exists and then not providing any evidence is the cosmological problem.
In theism it seems its fine to make a definition of a god, then make an argument that matches that definition, that way they seem at ease with using a definition of how they feel a god must be to be proof of a god.
Seems back to front to me
Craig never said that God was falsifiable, He said the way one would need to go about it is through who He is and to date no one has. We begin with faith in Christ and what He did on the cross. Then we will move on to belief as we experience God through Bible study and then in the personal relationship God will reveal to the faithful Christian that He is real and who He says He is. Before you come to Christ there will be no proof and after only you and those who live in a personal relationship with Him will understand what God has done in His revelation of himself to the believers.
GC
Many would disagree with you, GC, that the concept of "god" is logically inconsistent and self-contradictory. I know that you and WLC do not agree, but there are prominent philosophers who hold prominent chairs who say otherwise.
