Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 2:07 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(November 3, 2017 at 9:16 am)SteveII Wrote:
(November 3, 2017 at 8:54 am)Khemikal Wrote: Tell that to plants.  They don't recognize light, they can't "do anything" about it, they have no nervous system whatsoever...and yet the chemical inevitability of auxin transfer means that they grow toward and track the sun....a hell of a survival benefit for a photosynthesizing organism.

All that's required for auxin transfer to be beneficial is for auxin to be a photophobic growth hormone..which it is.  As far as we can tell, auxin was present in the algae forerunners of plants and not at all used for phototropism, but a much more general form of regulating morphogenesis.

A plants photosynthetic apparatus is a collection of modified light sensitive cells, supported by photophobic morphogens capable of conferring benefits without the addition of any of those other things you imagine to be so crucial for eye spots to be a survival advantage.

I was not talking about light spots. I specifically said "eye and associated neural functions" as an exact quote of DBP's statement: "From there you can evolve the eye and associated neural functions." A magic wand was waived and I want details how component systems evolved functions when they are dependent on each other to confer a survival benefit. 

What's stopping co-current systems evolving at the same time? If they're dependent of the other, both think of it as an AND function, where the off-spring that has both the increments "neural functions" and "eye function" have a better chance of furthering their genes than off-spring that only have 1 of the benefits. It's not that hard to understand.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution. - by Sal - November 3, 2017 at 9:23 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Do we have any female Christians left? If not, anyone is welcome to comment. Losty 34 5593 May 13, 2019 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: WolfsChild
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 12815 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Two audio books for Christians (and, everyone else) Jehanne 3 863 January 16, 2019 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Does everyone else feel dizzy from the lights in Church? Der/die AtheistIn 15 3232 December 11, 2017 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Any one else watch The Last Days of Jesus on PBS ? vorlon13 9 3174 April 16, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do Christians become Christians? SteveII 168 41472 May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians Nope 155 63434 September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  The first Christians weren't Bible Christians Phatt Matt s 60 19568 March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
Last Post: rightcoaster
  Why Christians Attack Evolution Michael Schubert 318 50363 March 21, 2014 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  Looking for Something Else and Stumbled Across This. Minimalist 2 1265 July 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)