Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 23, 2025, 11:27 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(November 3, 2017 at 11:21 am)SteveII Wrote: LOL. NONE of these answers my question: how does two or three functions that depend on each other for a survival benefit evolve through small incremental changes that are selected for a survival benefit? Your Youtube videos and links to Wikipedia only DESCRIBES stages that an eye might have gone through--not HOW is it possible to get from one stage to another. Even you must see that these are not the same thing and do not answer my question. Come on, according to your own link it has happened some 50-100 independent times! It should be easy to explain the mechanism. I'll paste it one last time for your ease in your reply:

Even if we presuppose an already vastly complicated cell to kick off the evolution of the eye, an eye makes absolutely no sense on its own. You need a mechanism to process the information and be able to do something about it to relate it to a survival benefit--or no increase in functionality will evolve. But wait, you don't need a light processing center to make decision if you don't have any light sensitive information to process. What came first, the ability to move, the ability to sense light or the processing center to ascertain some survival benefit from light and effect movement?  Seems like all three are needed for any survival benefit to occur. But wait, it's worse than that. For there to be an evolved increase in functionality in the eye (like to discern shapes), you would need a massively more complex processing unit for there to be any survival benefit---but what survival benefit led to the evolution of the processing unit without the complexity of the eye already present? How did that happen? For reference, this would be the "mechanism" sense of the definition of evolution which you said was fact.

We have already answered all of this in detail but somehow you refuse to see it, purely because the facts conflict with your pre-held position.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt but youre just being purposely obtuse now.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution. - by downbeatplumb - November 3, 2017 at 11:34 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Do we have any female Christians left? If not, anyone is welcome to comment. Losty 34 5600 May 13, 2019 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: WolfsChild
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 12825 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Two audio books for Christians (and, everyone else) Jehanne 3 866 January 16, 2019 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Does everyone else feel dizzy from the lights in Church? Der/die AtheistIn 15 3238 December 11, 2017 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Any one else watch The Last Days of Jesus on PBS ? vorlon13 9 3182 April 16, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do Christians become Christians? SteveII 168 41539 May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians Nope 155 63489 September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  The first Christians weren't Bible Christians Phatt Matt s 60 19583 March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
Last Post: rightcoaster
  Why Christians Attack Evolution Michael Schubert 318 50396 March 21, 2014 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  Looking for Something Else and Stumbled Across This. Minimalist 2 1268 July 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)