I was wondering how GC could possibly argue with my explanation. Let's really break down his objection shall we and see exactly what he is saying.
So are you saying that mutations happen or not? Basically you are in full equivocation mode at the moment. Let's rephrase exactly what you said to keep the same meaning:
"Mutations do not happen in nature. In nature the mutation already exists in the DNA. Or the DNA becomes mutated. The DNA has always been corrupted."
An utterly meaningless sentence.
So now you need to explain why lab work does not count. Saying "and you know it" does not count, sorry. What is it about a lab that means that the process is not equivalent? Ever heard of computer simulations? We now know you do not understand what information is so I suppose there is no reason to assume that you understand what a computer simulation is or why they are useful.
For the record. Mutations do happen.
Human mutation rate revealed
But I have no doubt that you will continue to state that mutations do not add information to the system without knowing what information is, in the belief that mutations both do and do not happen and that something can be corrupted without first being not corrupted.
(November 3, 2017 at 5:52 pm)Godscreated Wrote: that wouldn't happen in a natural situation, like you said you mutated it. in nature the mutation already exist in the DNA or the information becomes mutated for whatever reason. Either way the DNA has nothing new only corrupted info that was already there.
So are you saying that mutations happen or not? Basically you are in full equivocation mode at the moment. Let's rephrase exactly what you said to keep the same meaning:
"Mutations do not happen in nature. In nature the mutation already exists in the DNA. Or the DNA becomes mutated. The DNA has always been corrupted."
An utterly meaningless sentence.
(November 3, 2017 at 5:52 pm)Godscreated Wrote: Lab work doesn't count as a natural process and you know it. Even in the lab there has been no changing one kind into another.
So now you need to explain why lab work does not count. Saying "and you know it" does not count, sorry. What is it about a lab that means that the process is not equivalent? Ever heard of computer simulations? We now know you do not understand what information is so I suppose there is no reason to assume that you understand what a computer simulation is or why they are useful.
For the record. Mutations do happen.
Human mutation rate revealed
Quote:Every time human DNA is passed from one generation to the next it accumulates 100–200 new mutations, according to a DNA-sequencing analysis of the Y chromosome.
This number — the first direct measurement of the human mutation rate — is equivalent to one mutation in every 30 million base pairs, and matches previous estimates from species comparisons and rare disease screens.
But I have no doubt that you will continue to state that mutations do not add information to the system without knowing what information is, in the belief that mutations both do and do not happen and that something can be corrupted without first being not corrupted.
