That is wrong. We were having a discussion on a paradox of consciousness and non-consciousness stepping over to the other at some level, at some stage. It had to do precisely with understanding the vast difference between the two states, direction needed, and stepping ground between the two.
The paradox is there is such a huge difference between the two states, at whatever level. While senses like eyes and what not, you can argue started from this to that, and got more complex and what not, because there is bunch of similar things to eye sight (other senses that lead to other senses), there is nothing similar of non-consciousness state with a concsiousness state. A mutation or a few random mutations will not make it step from that step to that step. Something is either conscious or not. Whatever degree even the lowest sense of perception of the ghost in the machine would be so vastly different then no ghost in the machine.
Now everyone will just get into definitions and define this and that.
Ignoring and sidetracking the paradox I am sure.
There are other things aside from conscious that are impossible by similar logic, but I won't get into those.
And it has nothing to do lack of knowledge but rather our knowledge that it is binary, either there is a ghost in the machine or not.
Thus evolution is irrational as taught by Atheist naturalism perspective.
The paradox is there is such a huge difference between the two states, at whatever level. While senses like eyes and what not, you can argue started from this to that, and got more complex and what not, because there is bunch of similar things to eye sight (other senses that lead to other senses), there is nothing similar of non-consciousness state with a concsiousness state. A mutation or a few random mutations will not make it step from that step to that step. Something is either conscious or not. Whatever degree even the lowest sense of perception of the ghost in the machine would be so vastly different then no ghost in the machine.
Now everyone will just get into definitions and define this and that.
Ignoring and sidetracking the paradox I am sure.
There are other things aside from conscious that are impossible by similar logic, but I won't get into those.
And it has nothing to do lack of knowledge but rather our knowledge that it is binary, either there is a ghost in the machine or not.
Thus evolution is irrational as taught by Atheist naturalism perspective.