The Thread in question does not fall within the Prime directive IMO. We have recently acted on one that did. Why?
The thread adresses theism per se and the OP has posited a thorough case, that albeit offensive to some theists, has the merit of being a discussion starter. If it offends one, one should retort. Its the thing of this forum.
I don't think we should do anything when Mathilda presented her case, open for discussion, to reply back to the points raised by others. It is what a forum should be.
As far as I can, I will not shut down someone from speaking their mind in an open reasoned way.
The thread adresses theism per se and the OP has posited a thorough case, that albeit offensive to some theists, has the merit of being a discussion starter. If it offends one, one should retort. Its the thing of this forum.
I don't think we should do anything when Mathilda presented her case, open for discussion, to reply back to the points raised by others. It is what a forum should be.
As far as I can, I will not shut down someone from speaking their mind in an open reasoned way.