Looks like the general(s) was referring to "first" strike nuclear option in a non nuclear situation. Not nuclear retaliatory.
Wouldn't you want that from the military no matter who the president is? I'm sure they have a contingency plan for almost all scenarios and have reviewed them for legality.
Wouldn't you want that from the military no matter who the president is? I'm sure they have a contingency plan for almost all scenarios and have reviewed them for legality.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.