(November 19, 2017 at 2:33 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(November 19, 2017 at 2:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah, but you know, some people like to change the definition of words and purposely leave out important details so they can make stupid and dishonest accusations to fit their narrative.
CL, antiquity worldwide was IGNORANT, not just Christians, but EVERY RELIGION WORLDWIDE. And back then girls/women WORLDWIDE, were bartered between families like currency. And the mortality rate for child birth back then was much higher, so females were expected to pop out kids at a far younger age.
Mary was just a mythological character, but it doesn't matter. Back then the average age to expect a female to produce a baby was between 9-14. It was the same for most worldwide back then. Females were expected to produce at a far younger age back then.
But that does not even address the claim that someone can produce offspring without a second set of DNA regardless. The virgin birth NEVER HAPPENED.
I think the reason it may have been like that was bc the life expectancy was so much shorter. Kids that age were considered grown up. They worked and everything. It was just a different culture entirely.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
