(November 19, 2017 at 6:24 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(November 19, 2017 at 11:16 am)Brian37 Wrote: Are you kidding me? IT IS PRECISELY because that inept fuck has control that someone needs to have a check on him.
FYI it does not matter who fires the first nuke, friend or foe, that will hurt EVERYONE, friend and foe. Nobody wins in a global nuclear war. REAGAN AND JFK new this.
I think it is a bit naive to assume if we fire ours first, or in response, that there will be a planet left over for us or them to control.
Nuclear war is a no win situation. It is mutual destruction.
The world could survive a nuclear war, depending on the targets and the concentration and the size of the bombs. It could probably handle 500 or so smaller sized bombs without too much trouble. However, if it got into the thousands we would be in a world of hurt. Remember, we used to drop nukes on our troops all the time and Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt within weeks.
"Key word is "DEPENDING"
Only a delusional nut would take that kind of gamble.
We are not talking about a conventional ground war. BOTH friend and foe alike have enough NUKES WORLDWIDE to blow this planet up several times over.
"MUTUAL DESTRUCTION" LEARN IT!
And BULLSHIT, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were NOT rebuilt within weeks, that is fucking NONSENSE. Where the fuck are you getting that from?
And FYI, our world nukes today make Fat Man and Little Boy look like firecrackers.
I find it sick that you'd think we can gamble with our modern nukes.