How do religious people justify raising and slaughtering animals for food?

[Angrboda]

It's not in and of itself immoral, no, but it does have consequences for our behavior toward other humans which can't be ignored.  A species which encourages cruelty toward other species ends up promoting that behavior towards its own.  Depending upon what one considers the basis of morals, that may or may not make it a moral concern.  As I believe the purpose of morals is to promote the flourishing of our kind as a social species, this kind of moral overspill is morally significant.  So torturing animals is not immoral as an act in and of itself, but encouraging and promoting animal cruelty does have peri-moral significance.  I don't really care if little Johnny tortures the neighbor's cat, in so far as it is a concern solely about the neighbor's cat;  I care about what it says about little Johnny.  In addition, we may as a species be interested in promoting behaviors which are not in and of themselves moral concerns.  For example, being a civic minded citizen isn't necessarily a moral obligation in and of itself, but we may nonetheless desire to promote it for non-moral reasons.

Soooo...you're not a pet owner then?  I hope...?  😛

I love pets. So tasty!

---

It's not in and of itself immoral, no, but it does have consequences for our behavior toward other humans which can't be ignored.  A species which encourages cruelty toward other species ends up promoting that behavior towards its own.  Depending upon what one considers the basis of morals, that may or may not make it a moral concern.  As I believe the purpose of morals is to promote the flourishing of our kind as a social species, this kind of moral overspill is morally significant.  So torturing animals is not immoral as an act in and of itself, but encouraging and promoting animal cruelty does have peri-moral significance.  I don't really care if little Johnny tortures the neighbor's cat, in so far as it is a concern solely about the neighbor's cat;  I care about what it says about little Johnny.  In addition, we may as a species be interested in promoting behaviors which are not in and of themselves moral concerns.  For example, being a civic minded citizen isn't necessarily a moral obligation in and of itself, but we may nonetheless desire to promote it for non-moral reasons.

It goes without saying, as I'm sure you know, that I disagree lol. I think morality extends out to having a certain level of respect for the animals, and even plants, too.

Do you draw your conclusions based upon your moral intuitions, or based upon an explicit theory of morals? What would you do if the two were to conflict?