RE: The Burden of Proof
August 19, 2011 at 1:23 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2011 at 1:30 pm by Violet.)
(August 19, 2011 at 3:33 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Equally Anti religious claims shoulder the same burden. IOW : STFU
But note, only if they are claims
It's good to know that the brainless are exempt the burden of proof
(August 19, 2011 at 9:12 am)FaithNoMore Wrote: Well then fr0d0, prove to me that there isn't an invisible, ten foot, naked woman with breasts the size of my head floating 1000 yards in the air above you. If you can't, then that must be proof it exists.
Faithnormore is colorblind, and probably delusional. I'm going to say that it exists... but only to him
To the rest of us: we're just going to set him in the asylum for his own safety. He'll probably be a rapist when that illusion fades. Too much boobs can be bad for you.(August 19, 2011 at 9:50 am)Rhythm Wrote: well, they're invisible to you because you have closed your heart to Them. It's a choice you must make.
It's a "choice" that's made for you, rather. Silly atheist culture
(August 19, 2011 at 10:06 am)orogenicman Wrote: I also believe we could weaken the 2nd amendment to indicate that the right to bear arms is not absolute, and doesn't include the right for everyone to possess an assault weapon and a bazooka, particularly the mentally disturbed and criminals with violent records. But that's just me.
Good luck enforcing that now. Such people often end up disarmed when imprisoned. But good luck getting them there.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
