Record few Americans believe in Biblical inerrancy.

[vulcanlogician]

Philosophers disagree about all kinds of things. Go here and read:
https://plato.stanford.edu/

After reading the entire Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, I have to agree with you. There is definitely some disagreement among philosophers.  But one thing they do seem to agree on is the viability of logic in leading us to better conclusions.

Philosophers aren't like theists. They are putting their interpretations of the universe out there to be tested not to be believed. If there isn't disagreement, then it isn't philosophy. When someone makes an assertion in philosophy, it is expected that it will be challenged. It's not just a matter of apply logic, then get a solution. Philosophers examine logical arguments. If the logic of an argument is sound, then one has to find a problem with its premises in order to express coherent disagreement.

In philosophy, one is encouraged to ask questions and consider alternatives. I'm not including you in this group, but many theists take offense to something as innocuous as a question. It seems like cowardice to me. I welcome scrutiny of my worldview.

If the Bible is accurate, then no, logic isn't better than faith, at least not for the most important things.

But if the Bible is not accurate, if it is just a collection of myths and stories, then those of us who use logic and evidence have figured something out that others haven't.

Faith in Krishna or the teachings of Mohammed may fix others with resolve so that they can accomplish great things. Are you talking about faith in general or your particular brand of faith?

Like many before you, you're trying to dress up a materialist philosophy as something more than it is.

I find materialism plausible, but I don't feel the need to dress it up as anything it isn't. I am fascinated by contrary metaphysical views. The mind/body problem is a lot deeper than many assume, even seasoned philosophers. If you want to talk metaphysics, let me know.