(December 24, 2017 at 9:13 am)Wololo Wrote:I understand that. And, what I’m saying is that it is my opinion that viability, as the sole criterion for the legality of an abortion, is an outdated, oversimplified, rudimentary, and frankly, lazy approach to determining the value of human life. Especially considering what we know about the complexity of human gestation. I think it’s a perfectly fair subject for debate.(December 24, 2017 at 6:12 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: God, that’s horrible. 😞. I’m pro-choice, but twenty weeks is too late. I support bans on twenty week abortions unless there is an immediate danger to mother and/or baby. I mean, where do we/should we draw the line? And, why does this guy sound so proud of him self?!
A) Twenty weeks is not too late. The foetus is not viable outside the womb. That viability figure hasn't budged since the UK set 24 weeks as the limit in the 60s.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
