RE: Ohio bans doctors from performing Down Syndrome abortions
December 26, 2017 at 12:10 am
(This post was last modified: December 26, 2017 at 12:12 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(December 25, 2017 at 12:46 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Like I said earlier, people should be honest about the reality of what they are doing. If someone thinks it is okay to kill another human being in the early stages of his or her development they they should just admit it. That's the reality and everything else, whether or not the unborn can feel pain or are viable or count as persons etc,... that's all just window dressing. The question always is and always will be, is it or is it not moral to to kill very young human beings.
If you're supposedly so insistent on being honest then how come you keep pretending that an egg or fetus that has the potential to become a human being already is a human being when they by definition haven't actually became a human being yet . . . ?
Seems like you're the only one obfuscating here.
(December 25, 2017 at 10:45 pm)Losty Wrote:(December 25, 2017 at 12:46 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Like I said earlier, people should be honest about the reality of what they are doing. If someone thinks it is okay to kill another human being in the early stages of his or her development they they should just admit it. That's the reality and everything else, whether or not the unborn can feel pain or are viable or count as persons etc,... that's all just window dressing. The question always is and always will be, is it or is it not moral to to kill very young human beings.
By your definition a sperm is a human being 🙄
So is a tumor.
So yes. It’s moral to kill a human being so long as that human being isn’t viable outside the body of a person.
^^^
It's his definition that's crap. Indeed.