(December 28, 2017 at 2:43 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(December 24, 2017 at 12:28 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: But a fetus can tell it's mothers voice according to you ?
Not to mention the fact the article you linked only studied infants at a later age. They themselves say they would do a further studies on infants 2 weeks old . Clearly implying this is not sweeping study at birth.
Not to mention the matter seems hardly as clear cut as your saying
http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/12/us/baby-la...index.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25721916
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news...abies.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...ility.html
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/10/b...ath-skills
So your position seems incoherent.
My position isn’t incoherent, though I’ll admit my explanation of it was. First, just to be perfectly clear, I consider myself pro-choice. I am not advocating for a sweeping ban on abortions. Data and facts on the subject speak for themselves.
And its these data and facts that show us why keeping abortion legal is essential. Because making it illegal only makes things worse for both mother and child.