(December 29, 2017 at 6:01 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(December 29, 2017 at 5:45 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: It was the beginning of human life being defined based on what the Bible has to say about it. Presumably the Bible is what's relevant in how Christians define the beginning of human life. The funny pictures you get in your head are irrelevant.
Yes, but just because it was the initial cause, doesn't mean that it is all the rest. I don't think that what was described, represents most Christians, or that most I know, would equate a baby taking it's first breath, with God breathing life into Adam.
I quoted two other bible verses which support the position that the breath is the beginning of life, as well as the law from Exodus in which prenatal life is not accorded the same status as that of life that has taken a breath. Just like you ignore evidence contrary to your opinion on abortion, Christians ignore what their own scriptures tell them. If a Christian claims to live by the word of God, yet then ignores it and comes to a contrary position, what are we to make of it? Personally I find such people hypocritical and their moral opinions of little value.