(January 3, 2018 at 11:56 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(January 3, 2018 at 11:47 am)Khemikal Wrote: ........................? I didn't ask you if you thought it was wrong.
I asked you whether or not you might be able to identify some harm done if I waltzed up behind you and grabbed your dick. I've asked you whether or not sexual assault is objectively harmful.
The harm is subjective, it's really going to depend on the person, and how they feel (subjective). The act in question is physically harming.
If the person feels harmed because you touched their shoulder, would you justify a similar reaction?
And no... if someone runs up and touches my dick, I'm not gong to assault them. I don't really feel harmed, and there is no objective harm done. Is there an objective difference if he had accidentally touched the boob vs purposely?
Oh give it a break. What the hell difference does it make whether a person thinks the harm is objective because some sky fairy had it written in a book under the "don'ts" heading? Smug xtians like you make a much bigger deal about the righteousness you feel entitled to by standing behind your big invisible friend, than you ever do about people's actual behavior. You may be morally retarded.