RE: Arguments Against Thomistic philosophy
January 20, 2018 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2018 at 11:12 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(January 19, 2018 at 6:39 pm)FireFromHeaven Wrote: I personally see Thomism, especially as put forward by philosophers like Edward Feser, as the best method of rationally establishing Theism.
The best method in the absence of any evidence because your god does not and cannot exist. If it did, if there was an unequivocal and precise definition as to what a god actually was and reproducible evidence of its existence then no one would even consider Thomism or any other philosophical tricks for magicking a god into existence.
No one would argue about first causes, they'd tell non-believers and sceptics, do X, Y and Z and find out for yourself.