(February 17, 2018 at 2:59 am)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:If it wasn't a gun it would be something else, may not be as many killed with somethings but what it were a bomb, can get a menu for them on the net. I want my guns to hunt a shoot with and if need be to protect.That is still justification for not controlling guns .Just because the might use something else does not mean one should not do something about guns . An bomb is too dangerous to construct even if you can get the plans and the materials . Which is why mass killer go for guns there easy .easily accessible and don't require dangerous assembly . And can easily kill large numbers of people without the high probability of malfunction a home made has . There is no reason in a 1st world country you need to hunt . People should not die so you can shoot at targets . And in most scenarios a gun will not save you. And if you live in a place where a gun needed for protection you need to fucking move or fix that shit .
Hunting has replaced the natural cycle of predator/prey in controlling animals like whitetail deer. Having worked auto accident insurance claims made me aware of what hitting a 200 lb. deer at 65 mph can do to a car. And the passengers. I hunt coyotes twice a year. Invasive dog rats need thinned because the wolves aren't there to keep their numbers down.
