(February 19, 2018 at 7:47 am)Shell B Wrote: I think you may have gotten the idea that I think our police should be unarmed and unprotected. That's not what I said. I said as long as they are armed, and the government is armed, I do feel like people should have the right to bear arms with an encyclopedia of restrictions that are heavily enforced.If the government keeps trying to impose all of these gun laws the people in New Hampshire are going to get ticked off and exercise their constitutional right to have a revolution.
[Art.] 2-a. [The Bearing of Arms.] All persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state.
December 1, 1982
"[Art.] 10. [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.
June 2, 1784"
https://constitution.com/new-hampshire-s...-17842007/
Have you noticed that New Hampshire doesn't have gangs of thug cops shooting people willy-nilly?
