Christianity Is The BEST Religion....

[GrandizerII]

To all the rest who replied to my post I'm not going to get into a running battle with you there are to many wanting replies and I haven't the time so here is how it will stand.

In other words, "bla bla bla".

astrophysics has told so many contradicting stories about the universe on so many subjects and so many levels that it is a joke of science,

It's called progress ... advancement in knowledge, adjusting views and beliefs in light of new evidence and better logic.

Also, didn't you just diss someone for shitting on physics (even though she actually didn't)? How hypocritical can you get?

The Scientist can't agree on anything so they all promote their own fairy tales and yes that's what they are because none of them can be proven and most of what they claim hasn't been seen to exist,

Scientists agree on many things to do with the universe. For example, they agree with the basics of astronomy (the sun is a star, the earth and other planets revolve around the sun, the moon does not emit light of its own, the Solar System is just a small regional part of the Milky Way galaxy). They generally agree that the universe is expanding, that the universe is 13-14 billion years old, that time is relative to the observer, and that spacetime bends. That some scientists disagree with some of these more advanced views does not mean that they're not directly/indirectly based on both conclusive evidence and sound logic.

The silly Bible may be a collection of fairy tales, but not science. Science is evidence-based, the Bible is fantasy/faith-based. And also, you Christians can't even agree on the most essential doctrines of Christianity. Is God 3 Persons or 3 Modes of God or ... ? Is Jesus both fully human and fully divine? Is one saved by grace through faith alone? Is it "once saved, always saved", or is it not? Is hell really eternal, or is it not? Must Christians continue to keep the Sabbath? I can go on and on forever.

Also, don't forget the clear contradictions in the Bible.

So as you say to me the one making the claim has the responsibility to prove the claim. I'm guessing there isn't enough time for them to do this.

Sounds like you're not up to date with the latest scientific discoveries, and how predictions made by well-established scientific theories have come to pass successfully. Well, that's your problem, not the scientists. If you don't want to read and learn, then fine. Stick to your silly Bible. But don't blame scientists for your wilful ignorance.

They are even making up stories about killer particles that can destroy galaxies and even the whole universe, they couldn't possibly know of such a particle and live to tell about it, now how stupid is that and you all call me gullible.

Would you like to be more specific here? Maybe link me to an article? And how would you know they couldn't possibly know of such particles/whatever? Are you all of a sudden a better scientist then they are?

And you are gullible as fuck, no question about that.

As for evolution, until someone can prove that new information can be added to DNA naturally then tho whole of evolution is dead, it has never been proven and it never will be, end of story. Write all you want I will not waste my time with trying to answer 10 or more people in the same thread and about the same post. Good night and sweet dreams.

And here comes the special creationist talk. What do you mean by "new information"? And why can't things we observe as natural happen naturally? And why haven't you bothered to look up the clear and overwhelming evidence for evolution? Is it because you're an idiot?

---

In a nuclear bomb, a small bit of mass is converted into energy. In nuclear reactions, it is common for energy to be converted into mass.

You were claiming that life is a form of energy and hence would have to be conserved. But, if it is *transformed* into, say, heat, or chemical energy, that is quite enough to satisfy the conservation of energy. So the conservation of energy has *nothing* to do with whether life comes from life.

Furthermore, because of the aspects of general relativity (see above), it isn't possible, often, to even define a 'total energy'. This is one of the reasons it is possible to get a 'universe from nothing'.

---

Nope. Even if energy has always existed, that doesn't mean *life* has always existed. First, since life isn't a form of energy. Second, because there is no guarantee energy will stay the same *type* of energy. Life converting into heat, or electrical energy would be just as good.

Also, light sn't a supernatural entity. It is an electromagnetic wave. So, unless you are lcaiming your deity is an electromagnetic wave, your deity cannot be light.

Finally, light isn't, itself, a form of energy. It *has* energy, just like mass does. But it is not, itself energy. It has other properties than just its energy, like its momentum and angular momentum.

In other words, you have terribly confused God, light, energy, and life. None of the four is equal to any of the others.

Look, I'm telling you exactly what the Bible states, life = energy.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men - John 1:4

If life can exist after death of the body then is has to be some form of energy, you cannot say that life cannot exist after death because you don't know; but if life is energy then according to science it continues to exist...

Like I've said, it's funny how science seems to corroborate what the bible has been saying all along.

Where is the word for "energy" in the Bible? Are you serious?