RE: Christianity Is The BEST Religion....
February 20, 2018 at 6:53 pm
(This post was last modified: February 20, 2018 at 6:54 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(February 20, 2018 at 3:29 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(February 20, 2018 at 3:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If life can exist after death of the body then is has to be some form of energy, you cannot say that life cannot exist after death because you don't know;
There is no basis for suggesting that life can continue after death, so there is no reason to raise that as a possibility. Death just is the end of a life. If it wasn't alive it can't die. If it has died it is no longer alive. You can't know that there is a supernatural zone where your supernatural soul-body will go when your flesh and blood body dies. That is just a fantasy that has been told so long by so many that it seems like something you can say publicly to other adults and get agreement. But for those of us lacking that crazy idea there is reason to give it the slightest consideration. That part of what you believe is absolutely absurd.
Apparently there is basis for the suggestion.
http://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/why-a-ge...ntum-level
Quote:But there are some who think our attempts at understanding the nature of consciousness through neuroscience are doomed to fail unless quantum mechanics is involved. World-renowned Oxford University mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose, for one, thinks that consciousness has quantum origins.
(February 20, 2018 at 3:29 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(February 20, 2018 at 3:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: but if life is energy then according to science it continues to exist...
Life requires energy just as many other things do. Life itself is not energy. A light bulb requires electricity to be lit, but the bulb itself is not electricity. A gas powered car requires fuel to run, but the car itself is not fuel. How do you come up with this rubbish?
So what you're saying is that just like a car or light bulb, we can bring the human body back to life if supplied with energy?
(February 20, 2018 at 3:29 pm)Whateverist Wrote:(February 20, 2018 at 3:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Like I've said, it's funny how science seems to corroborate what the bible has been saying all along.
No, if you only want to use science to confirm those parts of your fable that haven't already run aground on reality, then you are obviously someone with no real appreciation for science or how it works. Nobody hearing you proudly exclaiming how your fable fits with science will pay you any mind so long as they've already heard you dismiss science out of hand where it contradicts your non-negotiable beliefs.
In case you forgot, I issued a challenge to anyone to show where science debunked the bible, not one of you could do it, so saying I dismiss science where It contradicts my beliefs is just an outright lie.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-51134-p...pid1641081
(October 19, 2017 at 12:43 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Name one thing in the Bible that scientific knowledge has debunked.
Now if any of you think scientific information was put forth that disproves anything in the bible, no filibustering, just provide the link to the post.