(August 29, 2011 at 11:28 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: Hello, most members of the public are convinced because like myself we are told by leading scientists that this has been covered as well as it can be however there is a lot of evidence to show that this is not the case .... by fellow scientists.
Please, go and find me a single cosmologist who believes that this subject "has been covered as well as it ever can be"... Oh, wait, you won't be able to, because it's complete bullshit - Not only are all conclusions in science 'tentative', meaning they are contingent upon the best/latest evidence, cosmogenesis is EASILY one of the least well understood of ANY branch of science, no scientist in their right mind would say it "has been covered as well as it ever can be".
Quote:What we are not being told is that the proof they say they have as far as their equations is incomplete or at worst made up.
Incomplete? YES. Made up? NO.
Are you truly this ignorant of what science is or how we determined that the universe was at one point probably extremely small or dense? The big bang idea comes as a result of extrapolating back the expansion of space according the principles in General Relativity, it's nothing more controversial than our best understanding of the history of the universe at the current time.
Quote:It's my birthday I'm at the tale end of a hangover and have been partying all weekend, I will get back to this tomorrow and if some of you watch the short video segment you will get a good idea of where I'm going with this whether you agree or not .... I'm here for discussion not to be a smart arse or talk about Sky Daddy's.
I couldn't care less about what you believe about a god, just make sure when you come back you actually bring your arguments with you...
.