Man Named 'Tiffany' Is Dominating Women's Pro Volleyball in Brazil

[The Grand Nudger]

Yes, I am saying males are inherently better than females at sports based on their sex alone. Of course some women can become stronger than some men. Of course that's true. But as a baseline, the average man is better at sports than the average woman, just physiologically.

If you don't agree with this, that's completely disparate from reality.

Males are not inherently better at sports than females based upon their sex alone, nor is the average man any better at sports than the average woman..physiologically.   Both of those statements are completely vacuous even if we -do- consider some sex based difference in outliers.   Saying it over and over, and demanding that it be considered "reality" will never change that.  The average man and the average woman, both, in the us..are tubbies who aint good at no sportsball....but one has to wonder why we're even discussing the average man or woman if the subject is pro athletes. Not a single one of them are average. Trans or cis.

So you can fall into an easier category!

For example, I think this comes up in chess competitions sometimes. If you are rated 1605, say, in chess, and you want to enter a tournament with an under 1600 rate and under 2000 rate category. If you enter the under 2000 rated category, you're going to get destroyed. However, if you intentionally lose a couple of games beforehand and get your rating down to 1595, you'll dominate the under 1600 category. You can farm prize money like this is you really want, but in no way is that fun or fair competition! Basically in anything with tiered competition, if you can choose to move tiers based on a personally decided measurement, you can take advantage of the system.

What easier category are trans supposed to be falling into..................and is there anyone in particular "farming prize money" you'd like to discuss? Is dropping a weight class also cheating, by dropping into an easier category..in your estimation?

I;m trying to find some middle ground here, because it's easy to point out that some guy, for example, is stronger than some girl. The explanation for that, however, is not penis. That's what makes these blanket declarations about the presence of penis being the deciding factor so pointless. If you have two athletes, both in the same weight class, both with similar performance metrics, and similar levels of perfomance enhancers coursing through their blood..you expect a close competition..right? That was the whole point of segregating competition and regulating enhancers in the first place, before any of these gender re-assignments became possible. Why would you expect otherwise when one of the athletes was trans and the other cis?

I think you're imagining a man in a dress competing with women, rather than a person who has completed their gender reassignment. I can't stress enough that there's no real indication that trans athletes have an advantage over anyone else at -any- point of the process...but supposing they did just for giggles and because so many people believe it so very..very hard......does it matter after completion? If there is a Male Advantage™.... they've explicitly sought to destroy it.