This might be a very black and white way of looking at this subject but...
If you do not agree with the science based theories (which are grounded by facts, evidence and observational rational conclusions based on what facts and evidence we do have at this current point in time).
Then you are most definitely going to be in the big brother camp (which is grounded by myths, superstitions and no evidence whatsoever other than books written by men)
UNLESS of course you don't care either way so you probably won't have an opinion on the matter.
Putting this aside, you have to realise that the big bang theory is not the only theory that attempts to explain the origins of the universe just as the much flawed creationist theory is not the only OTHER theory available to counter the BBT abeit with little or no evidence.
The point is, is that the BBT based on current data, evidence and observation is the most acceptable model at this current point in time.
take this passage from book "the grand design" by Steven Hawkings and Leonard Mlodinow.
"It is said that the electron was discovered in 1897 by British physicist J. J. Thomson at the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University. He was experimenting with currents of electricity inside empty glass tubes, a phenomenon known as cathode rays. His experiments led him to the bold conclusion that the mysterious rays were composed of miniscule "corpuscles" that were material consitutuents of atoms, which were then thought to be the indivisible fundamental unit of matter. Thomson did not "see" an electron, nor was his speculation directly or unambigulously demonstrated by his experiments. But the model has proved crucial in applications from fundamental science to engineering, and today all physicists believe in electrons, even though you cannot see them."
In other words to this day there is still no model that better fits the predefined laws of this universe than the model that Thompson discovered to prove that electrons exist. Therefore based on this model we have to scientifically assume that electrons do exist.
This example shows that based on current scientific facts and evidence we have today on the origins of our universe we can safely assume that the BB model is the BEST model we have to answer that question.
Kind Regards,
Citereh
If you do not agree with the science based theories (which are grounded by facts, evidence and observational rational conclusions based on what facts and evidence we do have at this current point in time).
Then you are most definitely going to be in the big brother camp (which is grounded by myths, superstitions and no evidence whatsoever other than books written by men)
UNLESS of course you don't care either way so you probably won't have an opinion on the matter.
Putting this aside, you have to realise that the big bang theory is not the only theory that attempts to explain the origins of the universe just as the much flawed creationist theory is not the only OTHER theory available to counter the BBT abeit with little or no evidence.
The point is, is that the BBT based on current data, evidence and observation is the most acceptable model at this current point in time.
take this passage from book "the grand design" by Steven Hawkings and Leonard Mlodinow.
"It is said that the electron was discovered in 1897 by British physicist J. J. Thomson at the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University. He was experimenting with currents of electricity inside empty glass tubes, a phenomenon known as cathode rays. His experiments led him to the bold conclusion that the mysterious rays were composed of miniscule "corpuscles" that were material consitutuents of atoms, which were then thought to be the indivisible fundamental unit of matter. Thomson did not "see" an electron, nor was his speculation directly or unambigulously demonstrated by his experiments. But the model has proved crucial in applications from fundamental science to engineering, and today all physicists believe in electrons, even though you cannot see them."
In other words to this day there is still no model that better fits the predefined laws of this universe than the model that Thompson discovered to prove that electrons exist. Therefore based on this model we have to scientifically assume that electrons do exist.
This example shows that based on current scientific facts and evidence we have today on the origins of our universe we can safely assume that the BB model is the BEST model we have to answer that question.
Kind Regards,
Citereh
Kind Regards,
Citereh
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." - Blaise Pascal
"Men are nearly always willing to believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
Citereh
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." - Blaise Pascal
"Men are nearly always willing to believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein