Big Bang theory is not valid.

[Diamond-Deist]

CMBR
I'd love to see those two links, so we now which alternative you're proposing.
[ space for links ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_micr..._radiation

FRW (the metric expansion of space)
(For the purpose of comparison I'll link the alternatives you put forward. I won a bet when you mentioned plasma cosmology btw)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_State_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology

I'm not entirely certain what you're attempting to criticize with the last two "quotes" So I'm just going to link you another wiki
[ space for your alternative ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

DM has been addressed elsewhere, obviously. So, there we have a semi-organized debate. Those two links that are missing in the text would be great, also, re: your claim that we have no evidence for an expanding universe, links to the contrary? I suppose until then we could talk about the three models under consideration. BB, SS, and Plasma. These links all have a great reference list for original papers, discussions, and of course more links on any specific topic.

(all courtesy of this wonderful link, took 10 minutes)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology

Well then the person you bet with should ask for their money back .... I never said Plasma theory was my chosen alternative, it is "an" alternative but there are two others not mentioned by you which are of a particular interest to me the creator of one of those models I am in direct contact with.

Also reposting Wiki is quite weak, we all know how bias material gets in there, Wiki is not always right by a long shot a couple of scientists I've been speaking to were even mentioning that.

Sorry death bunny, but apparently I'm a dreaming 15 year old (you might want to double that age), idiot, creationist, liar .... and whatever the hell else I've been called.



..............So this is my last post.