@wallym
Way to respond to what I actually have said instead of what you imagine my position to be.
/s
Deflection was a common gun nut tactic when I was one, I see you guys are still at it.
BTW, it it were possibly to abolish gun ownership and save lives, I would do it. If it were possible to retain gun ownership and save lives, I would do it. I'm interested in *harm reduction*. Perfect solutions aren't possible. Duh. The perfect is the enemy of the good. At least now we know that those 300,000 lives are, in fact, an acceptable price to you to maintain the status quo. Yay for you?
What isn't acceptable, is to do nothing, which appears to be what you advocate.
Way to respond to what I actually have said instead of what you imagine my position to be.
/s
Deflection was a common gun nut tactic when I was one, I see you guys are still at it.
BTW, it it were possibly to abolish gun ownership and save lives, I would do it. If it were possible to retain gun ownership and save lives, I would do it. I'm interested in *harm reduction*. Perfect solutions aren't possible. Duh. The perfect is the enemy of the good. At least now we know that those 300,000 lives are, in fact, an acceptable price to you to maintain the status quo. Yay for you?
What isn't acceptable, is to do nothing, which appears to be what you advocate.
