RE: Big Bang theory is not valid.
September 2, 2011 at 1:48 pm
(This post was last modified: September 2, 2011 at 1:49 pm by popeyespappy.)
(September 2, 2011 at 12:48 pm)Napoleon Wrote:(September 1, 2011 at 9:27 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: Also reposting Wiki is quite weak, we all know how bias material gets in there, Wiki is not always right by a long shot a couple of scientists I've been speaking to were even mentioning that.
You know what's weak? Coming out with the old 'wiki is not a reliable source' crap.
For your information, wiki happens to be just as reliable a source as any other information gathering website. The fact that wiki actually requires the people entering the information to source what they are inputting would actually make it a rather reliable source in my opinion.
What is weak is for some troll to whine about someone posting links from Wiki after said troll has been copying and pasting information from the same source.
Example
(September 1, 2011 at 8:42 pm)Diamond-Deist Wrote: Globular cluster age
In the mid-1990s, observations of globular clusters appeared to be inconsistent with the Big Bang. Computer simulations that matched the observations of the stellar populations of globular clusters suggested that they were about 15 billion years old, which conflicted with the 13.7 billion year age of the Universe. This issue was generally resolved in the late 1990s when new computer simulations, which included the effects of mass loss due to stellar winds, indicated a much younger age for globular clusters.There still remain some questions as to how accurately the ages of the clusters are measured, but it is clear that these objects are some of the oldest in the Universe.
From Wiki
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#Globular_cluster_age Wrote:Globular cluster age
In the mid-1990s, observations of globular clusters appeared to be inconsistent with the Big Bang. Computer simulations that matched the observations of the stellar populations of globular clusters suggested that they were about 15 billion years old, which conflicted with the 13.7 billion year age of the Universe. This issue was generally resolved in the late 1990s when new computer simulations, which included the effects of mass loss due to stellar winds, indicated a much younger age for globular clusters.[62] There still remain some questions as to how accurately the ages of the clusters are measured, but it is clear that these objects are some of the oldest in the Universe.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
![[Image: JUkLw58.gif]](https://i.imgur.com/JUkLw58.gif)