RE: Old threads of discussion I have had.
April 3, 2018 at 9:56 am
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2018 at 9:57 am by Mystic.)
(April 3, 2018 at 9:51 am)emjay Wrote: @K. The problem is, God will never 'flip' so to speak, so this could go on forever.
It can go on forever, but I argue the backward approach is best, wherever everyone doesn't dismiss truth because it sounds silly, but gives everyone and every human, a chance to participate in the dialogue.
If Atheists are right that Theists need to prove their case, and I believe they are right which I previously didn't, then Atheists need to give them a chance to present the proof if they are interested in it.
Otherwise, if they going to try to sabotage every proof and make a messy dialogue, believers don't have to convince an Athiest.
They can just refer them to a proof. And leave them alone at it.
Otherwise, the claim for proofs needs sincere dialogue recipients and attentive ears.
Quote:That the journey to knowledge at least requires a journey to self-honesty...particularly about ones own axioms.
And if there is such thing or it's a lazy way stay at a perception of abstraction and not get the eye of knowledge and certainty.
At least we agreed for once haha.
