RE: Old threads of discussion I have had.
April 3, 2018 at 10:49 am
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2018 at 10:52 am by Mystic.)
The property is who leads. And all problems, like the Torah properly says, is when people take the name of God and name themselves with it.
Everyone representing morality as if they know what's up when they have no clue and are in need of an Image of God and name of God like Adam, appointed by God like Seth.
It's possible but not reality. Reality is I have presented good arguments for God.
I looked back at that thread, and I saw in my Deist days, I use to say things very humbly like "I say I feel as if it's the case" and Stimbo properly pointed out, it's because I am not willing to take the honest position that I claim I know for sure, so the etiquette is either honest and I'm not sure or it's deceiving.
And from that perspective, I even began to appreciate the tone of the Quran better.
Everyone representing morality as if they know what's up when they have no clue and are in need of an Image of God and name of God like Adam, appointed by God like Seth.
(April 3, 2018 at 10:48 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You know who else gets accused of being babbling, incoherent, and vapid? People who make babbling, incoherent, and vapid arguments and statements.
Just because nobody can understand you doesn't mean you're some clear-thinking prophet-level theological guide. You could very well just be as nonsensical as everyone currently perceives you to be.
Seriously, go take a break.
It's possible but not reality. Reality is I have presented good arguments for God.
I looked back at that thread, and I saw in my Deist days, I use to say things very humbly like "I say I feel as if it's the case" and Stimbo properly pointed out, it's because I am not willing to take the honest position that I claim I know for sure, so the etiquette is either honest and I'm not sure or it's deceiving.
And from that perspective, I even began to appreciate the tone of the Quran better.
