RE: Testing a Hypothesis about the Supernatural
April 11, 2018 at 12:53 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2018 at 12:54 pm by robvalue.)
If we can only observe the effects of the supernatural and can never investigate the supernatural itself, then any supernatural cause is indistinguishable from any other; or from no supernatural cause at all.
That's the problem. People generally define these things so that they can't be disproven; but by doing so, they can't be proven either.
The only sensible definition, I think, is things going on outside of our self-enclosed environment (assuming there is an outside). Otherwise, it's just "unknown" or gibberish.
That's the problem. People generally define these things so that they can't be disproven; but by doing so, they can't be proven either.
The only sensible definition, I think, is things going on outside of our self-enclosed environment (assuming there is an outside). Otherwise, it's just "unknown" or gibberish.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum