RE: Best Theistic Arguments
April 16, 2018 at 6:56 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2018 at 6:56 pm by Mystic.)
(April 16, 2018 at 6:46 pm)Grandizer Wrote:(April 16, 2018 at 6:29 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: It doesn't matter about bias. If people just want to be argumentative and aren't will to digest your information and constantly try to side track the discussion and don't try to understand your proof and do their best to manipulate the conversation to make it ambiguous rather then seek clarity, it's not binding a person with such proof to present to such people.
Yes Theists have the burden of proof, as does God foremost have the burden of proof to prove his religion and himself if he exists and there is true path and way to him. But it's not upon either God or Messengers or Guides or their followers, to be burdened with convincing anyone and they can if they please turn away from presenting proofs they know to a crowd that has proven to interest to learning them but just want to argue and bicker no matter what truth there is.
What you said is probably true about me, but if I know the truth and you guys are interested, from my perspective, I should present it, otherwise, if people are only interested in trying to put the proof and light manifested by their mouths and mock the sacred truth manifested in the dialogues I provide, I am not required to convince people or even present further clarification when people are interested in confusion only.
You assume you have the truth, RR assumes he has the truth, Neo assumes he has the truth. Your truth contradicts theirs. None of you know the truth.
No one is saying you have to believe the other side is true before the dialogue, the problem, is there hasn't been a sincere dialogue for humanity regarding the truth, and you guys take the culture and traits of insincerity to the truth from my perspective.
I am not required to provide proof to people who don't have interest in understanding but just bickering.
