Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 31, 2025, 10:06 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Einstein is practical, but not theoretical?
#4
RE: The Einstein is practical, but not theoretical?
(March 5, 2018 at 4:54 am)robinhood Wrote: Is perfectly known, that the Einstein has disapproved the Black Hole (BH) solutions. It was horrible to have an divergence, the infinities (BH, Big Bang) in the equations? The Einstein has assumed Matter conservation during the derivation of General Relativity, but it is violated in the consequences: BH, BB. Thus, the GR is wrong. Recall, the Nikola Tesla (who was blessed by his father, Eastern Orthodox Christian) that Nikola was in disagreement with Einstein. You might argue, that singular areas of divergences can be replaced by hypothetical Quantum Gravity, however to preserve the analytical solutions, all derivatives must be continuous, so the Quantum Gravity must cover all area of spacetime. Thus, in any point of spacetime the current General Relativity has trouble (with conservation laws of matter).

The facts are:
1. the space and time can be curved. Special curviness accounts for observable effects. But I argue in the researchgate.net files, that curved spacetime pays no regard to energy-momentum conservation.
2. the Einstein and us have added many ad-hoc hypothesises into the original GR. First ad-hoc was the cosmological constant Lambda. Now it seems necessary to add Dark Matter tensor as well.

What does the energy-momentum conservation law mean? Energy means the body itself, and the impulse arises every time we run to this body: the body itself "runs" to us. So this law means the indestructibility of matter (within methodological naturalism). However, in Einstein's Gravity Theory, there are singularities, and the Big Bang, and time machines. All of them do not treat with due respect the invincibility of the material world.
“The collapse of physics as we know it” 
More complete in:


Monstrous Black Hole eats people in the clip: “Black Hole Sun”.

For certain, therefore, it is impossible to marry the Quantum Theory (latter respects the indestructibility of matter, because quantum scientists talk about "preserving information" even in the very epicenter of a thermonuclear explosion!) and Einstein's Theory.
“What Is the Black Hole Information Paradox?” YouTube.

So, we found out that the LAW OF ENERGY SAVING IS NOT IMPLEMENTED in the consequences of Einstein's Theory. However, in the article of the Russian Wikipedia "General Theory of Relativity" it is reported that
"In the general theory of relativity, the energy-momentum conservation law is used as a heuristic principle in deriving the equations of the gravitational field [Einstein A. Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity. M. Nauka, 1965, vol. 1, p. 490.] ".
We make a logical conclusion: Einstein's Theory of Gravity is refuted. Maybe from here spooks us the Dark Matter and Dark Energy: “What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?” YouTube.
Amateur Physics much?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Einstein is practical, but not theoretical? - by chimp3 - April 16, 2018 at 8:51 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Einstein Say Light is Massive? Rhondazvous 25 4267 July 8, 2019 at 10:15 pm
Last Post: brewer
  What Did Einstein Mean when He Said Space is Curved? Rhondazvous 33 12888 June 16, 2017 at 9:46 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Practical uses of big science projects Iroscato 18 6649 June 8, 2015 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  What is the smallest theoretical building block of the universe? Logical Adolecent 2 1489 November 20, 2014 at 11:23 pm
Last Post: Heywood
  How practical is it to major in astrophysics? passionatefool 22 18213 July 5, 2014 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Does Einstein Need Vindication? Minimalist 12 3718 March 19, 2014 at 1:34 am
Last Post: Jovanian Teapot
  Einstein's Derivation of the Famous Equation, E=mc2 little_monkey 0 1023 June 1, 2013 at 4:50 am
Last Post: little_monkey
  Weinstein = W + Einstein little_monkey 0 927 May 25, 2013 at 10:57 am
Last Post: little_monkey
  The Beauty of Theoretical Physics Perhaps 8 5289 December 20, 2011 at 5:17 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Not related to atheism but... Tiberius 0 1788 November 8, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)