Hadiths and deceivers.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

If you going to trust "Sahih" hadiths,

Not going to be an issue for me.  I promise.

yes, they are going to have a poison against Mohammad that absolutely would prove him evil if they were true.

Don't see meself needing hadiths to view Mohammad as evil.

The people who took the position of political, religious, and all levels of leadership, didn't believe in Mohammad, but just as previous revelations were distorted by the very deceivers who the books came to expose and counter with a real genuine leadership to balance the world out, and bring balance and justice to the world by exposing these deceivers and their falsehood,  yes, Islam was also infiltrated.

Do you think that powerful people not believing in Mohammad may have had something to do with the scorched-earth policy of early Islam?  I do.

This includes Sunni and Shiite hadiths. 

Potato, potahto.

There is poison in both of them. But don't be afraid of hadiths from any one to fall in your cup, for if one wing of a fly is poison, in the other is the cure.

I am not afraid of hadiths, but thanks all the same for your misplaced concern. 

The hadiths although filled with poison are also faced with insights. I suggest ignoring the rating of "good" "authentic" "weak" "established" "trusted" or "fabricated" and rather, only go them if you seek insights into Quran.

The technical term you're groping for is 'cherry picking.'

every persons just babbles about the Quran with no proof what so ever claiming they have the right interpretation.

This is an absolute gem and should be placed on every mosque in the world, preferably in marble letters twelve feet high.

Boru