Republidertarianazi shows off his thinking skills

[reverendjeremiah]

Libertarianism calls for a small-state with individual autonomy, Fascism calls for a large authoritative state.

This alone makes the two completely incompatible, a "little big government with both limited and unlimited power" is about as logically possible as a "square circle".

Yet everytime I read about Fascism I cant tell where the state ends and corporations begin. They blend so well into each other. It also fits with the Libertarian method in the states "vote economic freedom first, then YOU will get social freedom". You see, the Libertarians in the state only care for economic freedom. Once they are rich, they can AFFORD their social freedom. Do they want to give up their cushy lawyer job prosecuting drug offenders? FUCK NO! They will bump their cocaine lines and prosecute coke users at the same time. THAT, is the libertarian idea in the states. Freedom for ME! I havent seen a single libertarian choose ranks with social Progressives. Not a single one..and I tell you that I am VERY politically active. Because social freedom isnt profitable.

When you say libertarians and republicans are Nazis you are doing no different than if someone was to post thread after thread claiming that jews eat and rape babies, If someone did that and Summer or other people of Jewish descent on this forum felt personally offended would would you object?

Reach for them straws..reach and reach and reach for them..just a bit closer..
Jews eat and "rape" babies? Me? No.

Anyone who is everyone knows that Jews sacrifice christian babies to satan.

I don't agree with Adrian that "creationists are idiots" is a good example though it certainly has elements of offence to it, someone being a creationist means they believe things to be true about the world which are demonstrably false and while the beliefs can be idiotic calling someone an idiot unequivocally is almost always both factually wrong and offensive though it's hardly hate speech to the same extent, a somewhat a more analogous example would be calling all creationists paedophiles.

Watch Void as his libertarian "social liberties" melt down from "everyone deserves social freedom" to "I have power and you are offending me".

Shall me and you go through the site and rate up everyones warning meter for calling creationists idiots? Adrian says its equivalent. Are you ready to rate up 90% of the members of this site? So me calling Libertarians "Nazi's" is a "personal attack" on you personally. But the vast major of this site calling creationists idiots is what? A semi-personal attack? Di dI mention that the majority of Nazis were also creationists?

So, a fascist organisation supporting Ron Paul makes libertarians fascists?

Awesome! Obama is a communist, Democrats are part of the Phelps family, Al Gore is an environmental extremist/terrorist, Castro is a 'worker' etc etc...

LOL..I love it! TRUE...TRUE...

AE is no more an economic philosophy of gold than keynesianism is an economic philosophy of digging ditches, it is true for both that many proponents from each 'school' advocate those specific or similar ideas, a "gold standard" (or more specifically 'sound money') in the former and "digging ditches and filling them back up" (when there is sparse economic activity) in the latter but each idea is in no way a necessary part of the ideology, let alone it's defining element - They are conclusions reached by some of the proponents in response to various economic problems, 'sound money' (either tied to material wealth or as a function of economic growth) is a proposed solution (or more astutely a preventer) to the boom/bust cycle and "Digging ditches" (increasing government activity through any potential means - the Variable G in Y = C + I + G.) is a solution to falling consumption and the 'liquidity trap' and overall output in Keynesianism.

WOW...look at all of those bullshit equations. You cant predict economies. Where exactly do you place "human greed and corruption" into that equation?

Yeah..I thought so.

..and you say you are influenced by anarchist ideas.
As far as your test, I dont give a shit about it. What makes you think I place so much faith into Keynesian economics? Because I say I am a mixed economist? LMFAO! They have turned it into a fascist system, as always "privatise the profits, socialise the loses".

The rest of your post is you pointing out the mistakes that I willingly admitted, all the time still brushing the superman cape of your libertarian utopia and not admiting a single mistake of your own..as always.

There is no utopia. there is no inherent economic or social model. Being a fan of anarchy, you should know this.