RE: Civility subsection suggestion
May 2, 2018 at 9:57 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2018 at 9:57 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(May 2, 2018 at 9:46 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(May 2, 2018 at 9:32 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Sorry guys, I stopped reading after 2 pages but a solution may be to have it like A69.
Those that have proven to be civil when required can be granted privileges to enter.
Once you enter, you can comment and participate on many threads there.
This shields it from accidental shit posting and also from the public eye... What say...
I'm in! I've got all these new cleverly disguised derogatory terms I'd like to test out
I'd prefer it if everyone was allowed in of course, but this might be a good compromise. I'd support this approach.
My biggest concern with this is that I think anyone who wants to have a productive conversation will do so in 'The Classroom' (I'm calling the new forum this for now
) and if it's like A69, new members, guests, and lurkers will not see the good conversations and might not ever join.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
