You can have a discussion LC but the opposite of that, is talking about "peer review" and "science" to dismiss Creationist arguments. Of course, creationist are not considered scientist nor the theory of ID design as scientific, for no reason but bullying.
I don't care about authority figures. If you can show one of your scientist including Dawkins to properly assess irreducible complexity as it has been best presented by it's proponents, then do so.
I've read these so called refutations of it and they don't address it, but just scribble all over the place irrelevant things to obscure it.
I don't care about authority figures. If you can show one of your scientist including Dawkins to properly assess irreducible complexity as it has been best presented by it's proponents, then do so.
I've read these so called refutations of it and they don't address it, but just scribble all over the place irrelevant things to obscure it.