Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 3, 2024, 11:12 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread
RE: Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread
(May 7, 2018 at 11:19 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(May 7, 2018 at 10:42 am)Wololo Wrote: Bolded part: That was the whole point of the "debate", and frankly too the point of CL "civility" area. They need an area where their accusations and lies go unpunished or unanswered so they are going to do everything they can to make it hallen.


It'd be a first gor CL to disagree with Wooters.  Every time he picks a fight she defends him, every time he says something hateful about atheism or atheists she kudos' the post.

She's very much in the Cora Sherlock Opus Dei mould, superficially nice but when you start listening and digging you find she holds to quite horrific views.

1. Lol.

2. I take it you're not going to answer my question, so let me ask you again then. What "horrific, fundamentalist views" do I have? Particularly, that make me more fundamentalist than the group of nuns, like you claimed? I'd be delighted to know, my gorgeous love!

I think some of the basic tenants of Catholicism are horrific. I think being anti-condom and anti-abortion are both highly immoral positions. But I would never suggest you were anything but a lovely person with sincere views and I certainly wouldn't consider your niceness superficial. You probably think my pro-abortion stance is highly immoral but that's not the same thing as thinking that I'm an immoral person. And, likewise, I can think you hold highly immoral or 'horrific' views without me thinking that makes you anything close to an immoral or horrific person... in fact I think quite the opposite. You're a good person. I don't think Neo is though. The key difference is intentions.

It seems all about the agenda for Neo, from my perspective. I know we disagree on that and you seem to think he's a good person and sincere--although feel free to change your mind on that one!--but all I can say is: good on you for telling him off for comparing the AF atheists to dirt. That thread was very nice and respectable until he showed up, IMO. Even Drich, the true fundamentalist in the discussion, did a better job of being decent than Neo did. How embarrassing for him to do worse than Drich.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Open discussion of the Christian Why We're Here thread - by Edwardo Piet - May 7, 2018 at 11:23 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peterson's 12 Rules for Life v2.0-- actual book discussion bennyboy 238 19445 October 8, 2018 at 3:20 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Why I'm here: a Muslim. My Philosophy in life. What is yours;Muslim? WinterHold 43 8690 May 27, 2018 at 12:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Thumbs Up VOTE HERE: Final four questions for the Christian Debate vulcanlogician 43 4600 May 18, 2018 at 10:23 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Open challenge regarding the supernatural robvalue 38 6273 May 20, 2015 at 11:53 pm
Last Post: Faith No More
  "Everything has a cause and an explanation" discussion. Pizza 66 15428 February 22, 2015 at 11:59 am
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Discussion on debate between Esquilax and His_Majesty. Esquilax 169 31507 November 16, 2014 at 2:43 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Discussion w/ a Theist RE: Premarital Sex StealthySkeptic 110 20115 August 14, 2014 at 12:09 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  So, why are we here .. on this forum? Whateverist 69 21325 June 5, 2013 at 10:25 am
Last Post: dazzn
  Do we own our own lives? A discussion on the morality of suicide and voluntary slavery. Kirbmarc 36 14572 December 13, 2012 at 8:08 pm
Last Post: naimless
  Open Debate Challenge: Historical Jesus DeistPaladin 0 1687 May 10, 2012 at 3:11 pm
Last Post: DeistPaladin



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)