(May 7, 2018 at 1:37 pm)Joods Wrote:(May 7, 2018 at 1:33 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: As I've said. The section I proposed isn't just for theists.
Clearly your post that I just quoted speaks mounds that you feel that it should be just for theists. We all know how that section is going to end up and as many have already predicted, it will be in favor of theists who just can't handle having the same words thrown back at them that they throw at atheists, yet want a place on an atheist forum where they are free to be as judgmental as they want to be.
Congratulations for finding a loophole in allowing the religious to antagonize the non-religious on their own turf.
I don't see how. I've repeatedly said, and corrected people, that the section's rules will apply to everyone, and will be open to anyone who wants civil discussion. Atheists and theists alike.
The post you are quoting from me is me pointing out a double standard.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh