Intelligent Design (brief overview).

[Pat Mustard]

You can have a discussion LC but the opposite of that, is talking about "peer review" and "science" to dismiss Creationist arguments.

Why? The vast majority of creatards want their silly assertions to be considered scientific fact. Thus they need to subject their pronouncements to the full rigour of the scientific method.

---

"Everyone else is wrong, God has revealed the truth to me."  That's some dangerous thinking there, MK.  How the hell did you end up that far down the rabbit hole?

It's called having some courage to not be intimated by people claiming they have knowledge when they are not trustworthy enough to use reasoning nor humble enough to accept the truth.

And that way lies the path of a Torquemada or bin Laden.

---

I don't believe in scientific authority. 

And that's all the news from the 11th C. Tune in later as we update you on the latest shamanism developments.

To be honest it's not. Islam didn't get to be that anti-rational until three centuries later. Most learned islamic scholars of the 10th century would be at least open to the idea of evolution if you provided evidence.